|
February 19, 1996 |
||||||||||
Craig Declars a Winner in the Mac vs. Windows War |
||||||||||
In 1984. The only argument I've ever heard a Mac-eral make in favor of the Mac OS is, "Man, Apple was doing that years before Microsoft. Then Microsoft does it and everybody thinks it's cool." Hey! Wake up and smell the coffee! So what if Microsoft is just following Apple's lead. The question is, "What has Apple done this year with the Mac OS that Microsoft is going to duplicate five years from now?" The answer is: Nothing. That's right. The Mac OS (for all you Big Blue / Microsofties who never bought a Mac) has pretty much been sitting still ever since I got my first Mac in 1989. There are no significant new features to speak of. In the meantime, Microsoft copied some of the basic look and feel of the Mac but did it better, hence the raving press that Mac fanatics complain about. And of course Apple stole their basic look and feel from Xerox, so they can't even claim moral superiority over Microsoft. Some things that IBM / Microsoft got right:
Sure, there are plenty of nice things about the Mac. My wife set up our first Mac, and she knows very little about computers. Networking Macs is really easy. Some Macs turn on when you press a key on the keyboard. That's kind of cool. And then there's the Newton MessagePad. Not a Mac, but a really neat Apple product (technology stolen from GO Corp, former corporate home of Bill Campbell, present CEO of Intuit). So let's look at that argument again: Windows is everything the Mac used to be. But so is the Mac. There's ten times as many software titles available for the PC, and hardware is tons cheaper. In my opinion (nay, in actual fact) - the IBM / Windows combination wins the war. Now, I want no more discussion of this nonsense. |
||||||||||
Copyright 1996 © by Craig Rairdin. All Rights Reserved.